Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»ó¾ÆÁú ºÀ¼â ½Ã±â¿Í Àӽà ¼öº¹ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ »ó¾ÆÁú°ú º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ °áÇÕ°­µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Effect of timing of dentin sealing and provisional restoration method on bond strength of composite resin to dentin

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀç·áÇÐȸÁö 2015³â 42±Ç 4È£ p.353 ~ 363
ÀåÁöÇö, ÃÖ¿µÁß, À̺ó³ª, ÀåÈÆ»ó, ȲÀ±Âù, ¿À¿ø¸¸, ȲÀγ²,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀåÁöÇö ( Jang Ji-Hyun ) - °­µ¿°æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸°ú
ÃÖ¿µÁß ( Choi Young-Jung ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
À̺󳪠( Lee Bin-Na ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
ÀåÈÆ»ó ( Chang Hoon-Sang ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
ȲÀ±Âù ( Hwang Yun-Chan ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¿À¿ø¸¸ ( Oh Won-Mann ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
ȲÀγ² ( Hwang In-Nam ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of timing of dentin sealing and provisional restoration methods on the bond strength of composite resin to dentin. Flat dentin surfaces were prepared and the teeth were divided into three groups: control, resinrestoration with immediate dentin sealing (IDS), and resin restoration with delayed dentin sealing (DDS). For the control group, a dentin surface was bonded by using dual-curing dentin adhesive (Excite DSC) and restored with resin immediately. For the IDS groups, a dentin was sealed with OptiBond FL (OB) or Hybrid Coat (HC), and it was restored with following 3 provisional restoration methods: SQ/PQ/CQ {SQ, water-soluble separator (SEP) + provisional resin; PQ, petroleum jelly + provisional resin; CQ, temporary cement (Cavitec) + provisional resin}. For the DDS groups, a dentin was temporized with 2 provisional restoration methods: Q/CQ (Q, provisional resin only) without dentin sealing. After a week, the provisional restoration was removed and cleaned. The treated dentin surface was bonded using Excite DSC and restored with resin, followed by microtensile bond strength (¥ìTBS) tests. The ¥ìTBS of control and the IDS-OB groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). The DDS groups presented lower ¥ìTBS than control and the IDS-OB groups (P<0.05). The IDS-HC groups were exhibited lowest ¥ìTBS than other groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the ¥ìTBS regardless of provisional restorative method in the IDS groups (P>0.05). However, using CQ significantly lower the ¥ìTBS than using Q in the DDS groups (P<0.05). IDS with a etch-and-rinse type dentin bonding agent improved the bond strength. The use of ZOE-containing cement on the unsealed dentin surface decreased the ¥ìTBS.

Å°¿öµå

immediate dentin sealing; delayed dentin sealing; microtensile bond strength; composite resin restoration; provisional restoration

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI